Home   News   Article

Glen Homes (Scotland) Ltd given retrospective planning permission for eight houses at The Maltings in Muir of Ord despite objections from neighbours claiming they were too tall


By Ian Duncan

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
Councillor Margaret Paterson: Not happy.
Councillor Margaret Paterson: Not happy.

Councillors have "reluctantly" granted retrospective planning permission for a housing development in Muir of Ord.

Glen Homes (Scotland) Ltd had submitted the application to Highland Council for to build eight new houses at The Maltings – the proposal was an amendment from the original three blocks of flats.

Planning officers had recommended approval provided the developer puts in place a number of mitigating measures – because the new buildings would be close to existing homes.

Planning officer Julie Ferguson told members of the council's North Planning Applications Committee it was one of the last areas of The Maltings to be completed and the development totalled more than 100 houses.

One of the measures she had recommended was replacing the fence of a neighbouring property with a taller one because the windows of one of the new homes, which were already under construction, overlooked the garden.

She said the owners of the existing property, which they only bought two years ago, had found the prospect upsetting and they had also lost their view because the new buildings were in the way. She added: "This may have an impact on the amenity but it's not considered significant."

Ms Ferguson said there had been seven representations from neighbours who had also complained that the buildings were too high.

Councillor Kirsteen Currie (North, West and Central Sutherland, SNP) said she could not understand how the new buildings were so different from the original planning permission.

Ms Ferguson said the planners used to check for differences between planning permission and building warrants but they did not have the capacity to do that any more. She added: "The onus is on the developer to get these things right and they should be right and they generally are right most times."

Margaret Paterson (Dingwall and Seaforth, Independent) said: "I am not happy with the application, not at all, Glen Homes should be well aware they should stick to the plans granted."

Angela MacLean (Dingwall and Seaforth, Scottish Liberal Democrats) said it would affect neighbouring property prices and lessons had to be learned. She said: "We have to accept what is in front of us, to approve, and I am really unhappy about that."

Maxine Morley-Smith (Cromarty Firth, Independents for Independence) said she felt they were “reluctantly” saying that they had to grant permission, following the officer's recommendation, and the committee agreed – subject to a number of conditions.


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More