Home   News   Article

Police not for turning on controversial guns policy


By Donna MacAllister

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
Councillors say armed officers on routine duties is not a situation the public wants to see in the Highlands.
Councillors say armed officers on routine duties is not a situation the public wants to see in the Highlands.

THE decision to arm up to 30 police officers in the Highlands is final, despite an outcry from councillors.

Elaine Ferguson, the national force’s divisional commander for specialist services and tactical firearms commander, said the Chief Constable’s decision came down to the number of rifles and shotguns in private hands and strategic threat and risk assessments.

More than 40,000 guns are owned in the Highlands where gun ownership per head is one of the highest in Scotland.

Chief Superintendent Ferguson said: "The Standing Order gets reviewed every quarter. I would doubt that the information would change so significantly within the next few quarters."

The senior police officer journeyed from Glasgow to meet with councillors behind closed-doors earlier this week after the council voted overwhelmingly to call for a rethink of Police Scotland’s controversial gun policy.

Access was given to just one newspaper. The Inverness-based Scottish Provincial Press group, which owns the North Star, the Highland News, and 14 other Highland titles with a circulation near 80,000, was barred from entering the meeting by police press agents — sparking a raft of criticism online from the public.

Highland MSP and former police officer John Finnie said there was "something badly wrong with Police Scotland’s judgment, particularly, on this issue, which is of great importance to the public".

David Alston, the council’s deputy leader, said a kitting-up demonstration by two police constables showed that it only took a couple of minutes.

"We saw what was involved in them putting on the protective clothing and loading the weapon. A lot has been made of the potential delay but I think it was clear that if the Standing Order was in the form that allowed officers to keep the guns locked in the boot of the car the delay in putting them on would be about two to two-and-a-half minutes. That’s how long it took them to check the weapons, load them and put them into the holster. It’s not a 20-minute delay."

In an interview after the meeting, the Chief Superintendent insisted it would take longer if the officers were arming themselves under pressure. It could taken up to 15 minutes because they would have to find a quiet spot and listen to a briefing. "What you do not want them to have at that time is some distraction going on around them."

She said constables took courses in tactical and decision-making skills to make sure they were as safe as possible on the streets but no amount of instruction could help them decide whether to pull the trigger.

"That officer at that moment in time believes that somebody is about to kill or seriously injure a member of the public, another police officer or themselves. You can’t give somebody advice on that."


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More