Home   News   Article

Ross MP slams 'lack of accountability' over Highland City Region Deal cash


By Hector MacKenzie

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
Jamie Stone: 'There is a huge sense of disappointment'.
Jamie Stone: 'There is a huge sense of disappointment'.

A lack of accountability for the success of Scotland’s city deals is behind the failure of money from the Inverness and Highlands City Region Deal reaching the Far North, Easter Ross MP Jamie Stone has said.

A report by spending watchdog Audit Scotland has warned that Scotland’s city deals lack provisions to measure performance and many may have already missed opportunities to meet targets due to a lack of measures to track progress.

Of the £315m Inverness and Highlands Deal, 17 per cent of funding comes from the UK Government, 43 per cent from the Scottish Government, 38 per cent from the council and two per cent from other partners.

Mr Stone, whose constituency includes Caithness and Sutherland, said: “There is a huge sense of disappointment in the Far North that money from the Inverness and Highlands City Region Deal doesn’t make it to my constituency. Audit Scotland’s findings will do nothing to boost people’s confidence in this scheme.

“This lack of accountability or clear measures for success has allowed money to be concentrated on Inverness with very little being spent in the rural areas of this vast region deal.

“In 2018 I asked the Treasury for an audit on this deal but was rebuffed and told the deal was good for local economies.

“Audit Scotland’s report shows this is not necessarily the case. Both the UK and Scottish Governments must accept that communities in Caithness and Sutherland are not being served by the City Region Deal and look into a new deal that focuses only on the Highlands, as suggested by Highland Council leader Margaret Davidson.”

The Audit Scotland report can be read here.

* Click here to read more news.


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More